الجمع بين الطهارات الثلاث على الجبائر والأربطة الطبية المعاصرة دراسة فقهية مقارنة د. جميله بنت ناصر آل مضحي القحطاني

Abstract The significance of this study stems from its direct correlation with the validity of the Mukallaf's (legally competent individual's) purification. Since purification is an indispensable prerequisite for the validity of worship, any defect therein inherently renders the act of worship null and void. In light of the renewed juristic disagreement regarding wiping over splints and combining the three methods of purification, and coinciding with the contemporary medical revolution in splints, fixation techniques, medical bandages, and therapeutic plasters utilized in treating fractures, wounds, and injuries—coupled with the patients' urgent need for such medical applications—it has become imperative to ascertain the correct Sharia ruling concerning this contemporary medical novelty (Nazilah). This is achieved through a thorough examination of the views and evidences of the four main Islamic schools of law (Madhahib), weighing them against the insights of contemporary jurists in accordance with the higher objectives of Sharia (Maqasid al-Shariah) in promoting facilitation and removing hardship from Muslim patients. This research primarily revolves around delineating the nature and clinical applications of modern medical splints and bandages to deduce the ruling on combining the three purifications based on Sharia objectives and jurisprudential maxims. To achieve this, the study is structured into an introduction, a preliminary section, three main chapters, a conclusion, and general indexes, organized as follows: • Introduction: Outlines the significance of the research, the rationale for its selection, the research problem, objectives, research questions, literature review, methodology, procedures, and the structural plan of the study. • Preliminary Section: Explores the conceptual definition of combining the three purifications in Islamic jurisprudence and the sequential ordering of Tayammum (dry ablation) among these purifications. • Chapter One: Examines the nature, realities, and types of modern medical splints, bandages, and therapeutic plasters from the perspectives of both classical and contemporary jurists. • Chapter Two: Discusses the juristic trends of classical and contemporary scholars across the four schools of law regarding the issue of combining the three purifications on modern medical splints and bandages, while contrasting these three trends and elucidating the origins and causes of their juristic disagreement. • Chapter Three: Provides the preponderant juristic view (Tarjih) regarding the ruling on combining the three purifications on modern medical splints and bandages, anchored upon Sharia maxims and objectives, alongside the resolutions of Islamic Fiqh academies, contemporary Fatwas, and institutional Sharia boards. • Conclusion: Presents the prominent findings that achieve a balanced framework in accordance with Sharia maxims and objectives. It concludes that if a patient can safely remove the

تحميل البحث (PDF)