فاعلية البدائل غير القضائية والتحكيمية في منازعات الاستثمارات الدولية د. حسين بن جائز العزيزي

Abstract This study aims to examine non-judicial alternatives to arbitration in international investment disputes, as modern mechanisms to resolve disputes arising between states and foreign investors. The importance of these alternatives has emerged due to their increasing efficiency and reliability as substitutes for judicial arbitration in settling international investment disputes. The research adopts two main methodologies. The first is the analytical approach, where the researcher analyzes the legal concepts of non-judicial alternatives, clarifies their various forms—such as negotiation, mediation, and others, also reviews the legal foundations upon which these alternatives are based within international investment contract agreements. The second method is the comparative approach, which is used to compare non-judicial alternatives with international arbitration in relation to international investment dispute cases. The study concludes that non-judicial alternatives to arbitration represent a practical and complementary option to international arbitration, as they provide procedural flexibility, reduce dispute resolution costs, and contribute to enhancing mutual trust between states and investors. Key words: Non-Judicial Alternatives. International Investment. International Arbitration

تحميل البحث (PDF)