دور المذاهب الفقهية في نبذ التطرف والغلو دراسة فقهية تأصيلية د. سبتي بن مصيليت العنزي

Abstract This study seeks to examine the approaches of the classical jurists in rejecting extremism and radicalism, thereby underscoring the inherent tolerance of Islam and the centrality of moderation and balance within Islamic law. The research problem is framed around the dangers posed by extremism in matters of creed, acts of worship, and social transactions, as well as the deviation from authentic scriptural texts through forms of ijtihad that lack adherence to the established principles of juristic reasoning. The study adopted the inferential and analytical approach in examining the views of the leading scholars of the Islamic juristic schools and the resolutions of Islamic scholarly councils. Accordingly, the study addresses two core questions: What role did the four leading Imams play in rejecting extremism and radicalism? And what are the primary causes of contemporary intellectual deviation? Key themes explored include: the principles of moderation and balance in Sharia, the methodological foundations of the legal schools in countering extremism, the emphasis on ease and the removal of undue hardship in Islamic law, critical examinations of excessive practices in worship and transactions, and the pivotal role of contemporary fiqh academies in safeguarding the Muslim community against radical interpretations. Keywords: Extremism, Radicalism, Takfir, Jurists, Schools of Islamic Law

تحميل البحث (PDF)