توظيف القراءات القرآنية في الترجيح التفسيري: دراسة تأصيلية تطبيقية د. مهند بابكر موسى البدوي

Abstract This study aims to examine the impact of Qur’anic readings (mutawātir and shādhdh) and their use in weighing the opinions of Qur’anic exegetes and selecting the interpretation that is strongest in terms of indication and meaning. The significance of the study lies in highlighting the close relationship between the sciences of Qur’anic readings and Qur’anic exegesis, and in demonstrating how leading exegetes employed the various readings to support the interpretation closest to the objectives and meanings of the Qur’anic text, in accordance with established scholarly rules and methodological principles. The study adopts an inductive-analytical approach by collecting the exegetical rules and instances in which Qur’anic readings were employed as a means of preference (tarjīḥ) and then examining and analyzing them to clarify the methods of reasoning and the precision involved in using such readings for interpretive preference. A brief overview of the structure and findings of the study: - Qur’anic readings are among the strongest means of interpretive preference, as they constitute transmitted revelation through which parts of the Qur’an explain and clarify one another. - A mutawātir reading takes precedence as a basis for interpretive preference; it may clarify what is expressed in general terms, specify a general meaning, or restrict an unrestricted meaning. - A shādhdh reading may be used as corroborative evidence and may be treated as an āḥād report or as transmitted exegesis when its chains of transmission are established and its linguistic and juristic validity is sound. - It is essential for the exegete to adhere to the established Sharīʿah and linguistic principles when employing Qur’anic readings as a basis for interpretive preference, in Keywords: Qur'anic Readings; Exegetical Preference; Rules of Tafsir; Grammatical and Semantic Direction; Science of Tafsir

تحميل البحث (PDF)