The Relationship of Linguistics to Morphology

Abstract

The aim of the research is to understand the concept of morphology and the difference between that term and which the word is formed, to identify the different types of morphology in the light of linguistics, to reveal the method used in formulating words, and to determine the nature of the relationship. Between linguistics and morphology, The research followed the descriptive historical approach the research was divided into the following chapters: the first chapter, the morphological term, the second chapter, linguistics, and the third chapter, the relationship of morphology to linguistics. The research concluded with a set of results, as the research showed a multiplicity of morphological terms indicating one concept that are expressed in multiple terms. The research showed that it did not reach The Arabs introduced morphological terms in linguistics only after a period of the emergence of linguistics in Western countries. Scientists realized the relationship between linguistics and morphology and realized the intersection between linguistics and morphology, which led to the emergence of a field of study located in the area of the intersection between linguistics and other terms related to it, to identify the components of the morphological system, to identify the elements from morphology, which is the field of phenomenology, and it is based on organizational relationships. Contextualism because it studies the sounds in a particular penny and the changes that result from this juxtaposition are subject to the laws of similarity and dissimilarity. The research concluded with a set of recommendations, the most important of which is not to merge the study of grammar and the study of morphology, and they must be separated at two different levels, as merging leads to a disruption of the order of the language. The research also recommended that a distinction must be made between the linguistics approach and the philology approach, as each approach leads to There is a difference in morphological terminology in both approaches, and it is necessary to bring the language closer to its users, not necessarily by following modern theories.