The Arbitration Procedures in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 10.35781/1637-000-108-004

Abstract

The research aimed to know the arbitration procedures in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, that are divided into two sections (before the formation of the arbitration body, after the formation of the arbitration body) and the comparison of them while supporting this with the judicial rulings that the researcher obtained. The researcher pursued the comparative curriculum in order to compare the Saudi arbitration system with the Egyptian arbitration law, which came different with regard to some procedures, and therefore the study will compare the provisions of the arbitration system in light of the Egyptian arbitration law for the purpose of reaching the proper results to address the problem, as the researcher chose the analytical approach to analyzing judgments Judicial applications with regular texts. The researcher has reached several important results, the most prominent of which is the Saudi and Egyptian systems excelled in flexibility in determining the language of depositing the arbitration rule, as well as the place of the deposited ruling, as well as the Saudi organizer is distinguished by solving the problem of the lack of a majority of the issuance of the arbitration judgment, by resorting to the competent court to appoint a weighted arbitrator, and finally the need to impose the imposition Attach a copy of the arbitration agreement as part of the arbitration ruling in the Saudi arbitration system.